By safeguarding, I mean the ordinary clinical steps a clinician would take when AI use is contributing to a significant safety concern, for example escalating suicidality, psychosis or mania, coercion or exploitation, threats toward another person, severe deterioration in functioning, or a level of dependency that is displacing sleep, treatment or human relationships
By safeguarding, I mean the ordinary clinical steps a clinician would take when AI use is contributing to a significant safety concern, for example escalating suicidality, psychosis or mania, coercion or exploitation, threats toward another person, severe deterioration in functioning, or a level of dependency that is displacing sleep, treatment or human relationships
I'm curious what you consider "safeguarding" in this situation? I am assuming you are suggesting an addiction-framed working model for management?
Scott I enjoyed reading this. I’m running a series of CE workshops for therapists to build their skills in addressing patient AI use. Here is the link: https://app.tpn.health/education/ai-ask-3a82dee9?utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=direct